Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Federal judge gave the green light to sue firearm companies
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Snattlerake" data-source="post: 3430517" data-attributes="member: 44288"><p>Here is the crux of the matter. A boy accidentally killed a friend with a gun he thought was unloaded.</p><p>It is apparent the child removed the magazine and assumed the gun was unloaded. He pointed the gun at his friend and pulled the trigger. Bang! It is the gun manufacturer's fault the boy didn't obey rule number 1 and rule number 2. I feel the parents are grieving and see a money tree on the horizon for not teaching their kid about personal responsibility and the dangers of firearms and you don't respawn when you are killed.</p><p></p><p><em>Gustafson's parents sued both Springfield Armory and Saloom Department Store, asserting that they "were negligent and strictly liable for manufacturing and/or selling the defective handgun that caused their son's death," court documents state, alleging the gun's design was defective because it lacked a safety feature "to disable it from firing without the clip attached."</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Snattlerake, post: 3430517, member: 44288"] Here is the crux of the matter. A boy accidentally killed a friend with a gun he thought was unloaded. It is apparent the child removed the magazine and assumed the gun was unloaded. He pointed the gun at his friend and pulled the trigger. Bang! It is the gun manufacturer's fault the boy didn't obey rule number 1 and rule number 2. I feel the parents are grieving and see a money tree on the horizon for not teaching their kid about personal responsibility and the dangers of firearms and you don't respawn when you are killed. [I]Gustafson's parents sued both Springfield Armory and Saloom Department Store, asserting that they "were negligent and strictly liable for manufacturing and/or selling the defective handgun that caused their son's death," court documents state, alleging the gun's design was defective because it lacked a safety feature "to disable it from firing without the clip attached."[/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Federal judge gave the green light to sue firearm companies
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom