Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Federal Judge in Kansas Rules Machine Gun Bans Are Unconstitutional
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OK Corgi Rancher" data-source="post: 4317182" data-attributes="member: 45773"><p>Yeah...it doesn't work that way. Mostly because I never blamed anyone...young or old...in some sweeping, overly simplistic and broadly generalized statement. I simply asked for an explanation of why "old people" are the root of the problem.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, gee... That does seem to make sense that a particular generation of people will be more prominent in government as they mature. That's like saying the majority of high school graduates are 17 or 18. We're beginning to see post-boomer generations gaining more seats. So what? Who ya gonna blame when the boomers are gone or are only in a few seats?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Therefore what?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I never said they did that, either. As a matter of fact, each one grew government. But none of those presidents did it by themselves and none of those presidents were elected only by boomers and none of those presidents had a boomer-only congress. Presidents don't single-handedly grow or shrink government.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OK Corgi Rancher, post: 4317182, member: 45773"] Yeah...it doesn't work that way. Mostly because I never blamed anyone...young or old...in some sweeping, overly simplistic and broadly generalized statement. I simply asked for an explanation of why "old people" are the root of the problem. Well, gee... That does seem to make sense that a particular generation of people will be more prominent in government as they mature. That's like saying the majority of high school graduates are 17 or 18. We're beginning to see post-boomer generations gaining more seats. So what? Who ya gonna blame when the boomers are gone or are only in a few seats? Therefore what? I never said they did that, either. As a matter of fact, each one grew government. But none of those presidents did it by themselves and none of those presidents were elected only by boomers and none of those presidents had a boomer-only congress. Presidents don't single-handedly grow or shrink government. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Federal Judge in Kansas Rules Machine Gun Bans Are Unconstitutional
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom