Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Felons not legally required to register their firearms
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave70968" data-source="post: 2294136" data-attributes="member: 13624"><p>Unfortunately, <em>Haynes</em> is no longer good law. Congress amended the statute to "fix" the "loophole*" and the courts have responded accordingly:</p><p></p><p>By granting immunity, the Fifth Amendment issue is avoided. There's also an additional quirk: the revised law puts the onus on the <em>transferor</em>, not the <em>transferee</em>, to complete the registration. Again, this avoids the Fifth Amendment issue by not requiring the (prohibited) transferee to register, but still allows him to be prosecuted for possession of an unregistered item.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Whether you believe IRS information is confidential is up to you; still, the courts have held (and thus, you will be prosecuted under the theory, be it right or wrong) that the law as it presently exists is not in conflict with the Fifth Amendment.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>* Let us not forget the AR-pattern rifles that were permissible under the AWB because they met the "loophole" of not having enough of the banned features. <strong>loophole</strong> (noun, euphemistic): complying with the law as written.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave70968, post: 2294136, member: 13624"] Unfortunately, [I]Haynes[/I] is no longer good law. Congress amended the statute to "fix" the "loophole*" and the courts have responded accordingly: By granting immunity, the Fifth Amendment issue is avoided. There's also an additional quirk: the revised law puts the onus on the [I]transferor[/I], not the [I]transferee[/I], to complete the registration. Again, this avoids the Fifth Amendment issue by not requiring the (prohibited) transferee to register, but still allows him to be prosecuted for possession of an unregistered item. Whether you believe IRS information is confidential is up to you; still, the courts have held (and thus, you will be prosecuted under the theory, be it right or wrong) that the law as it presently exists is not in conflict with the Fifth Amendment. * Let us not forget the AR-pattern rifles that were permissible under the AWB because they met the "loophole" of not having enough of the banned features. [B]loophole[/B] (noun, euphemistic): complying with the law as written. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Felons not legally required to register their firearms
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom