Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Firearm in car on company property.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kiyot" data-source="post: 884853" data-attributes="member: 627"><p>It is Title 21 1289.7a and 1290.22. It was not overturned as I recall. There was a sticky in here at one time, but looks like it was unstickied. It was enjoined by a Tulsa area judge, shortly after the being enacted into law in 2004. The law was changed again in 2005, adding parts about removing liability from the person, property owner, tenant, employer, or business entity who owned the parking lot where a gun in a vehicle is parked and also allows you to bring a civil action against the company for maintaining, establishing or enforcing a police against such. Finally about a year or so ago the injunction was finally reversed by the 10th Circuit court. So the law should be in full effect.</p><p></p><p>Some people believe the Weyerhauser employees losing thier appeal in 2004 or 2005 (can't remember which year) on thier being fired in 2003 after the new law was enacted is proof that the law has been overturned or is not enforceable, but that is not true. The reason is because 1289.7a and 1290.22 were signed into law in 2004, and was not signed in as retroactive so the appellate court was not able to consider the new law into the appeal. </p><p></p><p>That is not to say they can't still search your car and if they find a firearm then fire you for any reason they choose. But if they come right out and say we are firing you for having a firearm in your car you do have a recourse and can sue the company for "actual damages"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kiyot, post: 884853, member: 627"] It is Title 21 1289.7a and 1290.22. It was not overturned as I recall. There was a sticky in here at one time, but looks like it was unstickied. It was enjoined by a Tulsa area judge, shortly after the being enacted into law in 2004. The law was changed again in 2005, adding parts about removing liability from the person, property owner, tenant, employer, or business entity who owned the parking lot where a gun in a vehicle is parked and also allows you to bring a civil action against the company for maintaining, establishing or enforcing a police against such. Finally about a year or so ago the injunction was finally reversed by the 10th Circuit court. So the law should be in full effect. Some people believe the Weyerhauser employees losing thier appeal in 2004 or 2005 (can't remember which year) on thier being fired in 2003 after the new law was enacted is proof that the law has been overturned or is not enforceable, but that is not true. The reason is because 1289.7a and 1290.22 were signed into law in 2004, and was not signed in as retroactive so the appellate court was not able to consider the new law into the appeal. That is not to say they can't still search your car and if they find a firearm then fire you for any reason they choose. But if they come right out and say we are firing you for having a firearm in your car you do have a recourse and can sue the company for "actual damages" [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Firearm in car on company property.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom