Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
FISA Abuse Memo
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave70968" data-source="post: 3074782" data-attributes="member: 13624"><p>I can't find specific examples offhand, but I do see news stories, including claims that the DoJ's own reports to Congress acknowledge the use of USA PATRIOT Act provisions for non-terror offenses, to wit:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/28/us/us-uses-terror-law-to-pursue-crimes-from-drugs-to-swindling.html" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/28/us/us-uses-terror-law-to-pursue-crimes-from-drugs-to-swindling.html</a> [<strong>emphasis</strong> mine; also note that this story is from September 2003, so those "many hundreds" of nonterrorism cases are in a fairly short period of time]</p><p></p><p>Another:</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.aclu.org/other/myths-and-realities-about-patriot-act" target="_blank">https://www.aclu.org/other/myths-and-realities-about-patriot-act</a> [article from 2004]</p><p></p><p>From the same story:</p><p></p><p>Fourth Amendment? How quaint!</p><p></p><p>Another story:</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/10/peekaboo-i-see-you-government-uses-authority-meant-terrorism-other-uses" target="_blank">https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/10/peekaboo-i-see-you-government-uses-authority-meant-terrorism-other-uses</a> [<strong>emphasis</strong> mine; 2014 story]</p><p></p><p>See also:</p><p></p><p><a href="https://news.vice.com/article/law-enforcement-is-using-sneak-and-peek-patriot-act-power-but-not-to-bust-terrorists" target="_blank">https://news.vice.com/article/law-enforcement-is-using-sneak-and-peek-patriot-act-power-but-not-to-bust-terrorists</a> [<strong>emphasis</strong> mine; 2014 story referencing EFF report above]</p><p></p><p>Or this one:</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.deseretnews.com/article/510054330/Patriot-Act-targeting-common-criminals.html" target="_blank">https://www.deseretnews.com/article/510054330/Patriot-Act-targeting-common-criminals.html</a></p><p>I'm not going to argue that running a meth lab is a <em>good</em> thing, but "manufacturer of chemical weapons?" Are we really putting meth on the same legal plane as ricin or sarin gas? C'mon, let's at least <em>pretend</em> to be going after actual terrorists. As to the law, sodium hypochlorite is toxic, but I don't see anybody bringing charges for not only manufacturing, but <em>actively marketing</em> the sale of NaClO solution (you'll find it in the laundry aisle; it's called "bleach"). Even <em>water</em> is toxic in sufficient concentration! Talk about a grossly overbroad law, having only the barest wisp of a nexus to terrorism.</p><p></p><p>As to the seminars to local law enforcement, again, I distinctly remember when they were in the news, but that's been a decade or more ago (under the Bush Administration), so finding those stories is a little tougher now. Here's one story on the topic:</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/terror-laws-used-vs-common-crimes/" target="_blank">https://www.cbsnews.com/news/terror-laws-used-vs-common-crimes/</a> [September 2003 story]</p><p></p><p>See also: Walter Brasch's <em>America's Unpatriotic Acts</em>, p. 75-76. The claims have footnotes for support, but I can't chase them down as the notes pages aren't included in the excerpt on Google:</p><p><a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=NH6axRj4HQkC&pg=PA76&lpg=PA76&dq=National+Association+of+Criminal+Defense+Attorneys+PATRIOT+Act+seminars&source=bl&ots=3FVfKP1YIf&sig=X-HTAI-twaUNIRY1BT5pXq7uy38&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiWgJPUkuzYAhVvhq0KHTSSDIQQ6AEIUTAF#v=onepage&q=National%20Association%20of%20Criminal%20Defense%20Attorneys%20PATRIOT%20Act%20seminars&f=false" target="_blank">https://books.google.com/books?id=NH6axRj4HQkC&pg=PA76&lpg=PA76&dq=National+Association+of+Criminal+Defense+Attorneys+PATRIOT+Act+seminars&source=bl&ots=3FVfKP1YIf&sig=X-HTAI-twaUNIRY1BT5pXq7uy38&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiWgJPUkuzYAhVvhq0KHTSSDIQQ6AEIUTAF#v=onepage&q=National Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys PATRIOT Act seminars&f=false</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave70968, post: 3074782, member: 13624"] I can't find specific examples offhand, but I do see news stories, including claims that the DoJ's own reports to Congress acknowledge the use of USA PATRIOT Act provisions for non-terror offenses, to wit: [URL]http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/28/us/us-uses-terror-law-to-pursue-crimes-from-drugs-to-swindling.html[/URL] [[B]emphasis[/B] mine; also note that this story is from September 2003, so those "many hundreds" of nonterrorism cases are in a fairly short period of time] Another: [URL]https://www.aclu.org/other/myths-and-realities-about-patriot-act[/URL] [article from 2004] From the same story: Fourth Amendment? How quaint! Another story: [URL]https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/10/peekaboo-i-see-you-government-uses-authority-meant-terrorism-other-uses[/URL] [[B]emphasis[/B] mine; 2014 story] See also: [URL]https://news.vice.com/article/law-enforcement-is-using-sneak-and-peek-patriot-act-power-but-not-to-bust-terrorists[/URL] [[B]emphasis[/B] mine; 2014 story referencing EFF report above] Or this one: [URL]https://www.deseretnews.com/article/510054330/Patriot-Act-targeting-common-criminals.html[/URL] I'm not going to argue that running a meth lab is a [I]good[/I] thing, but "manufacturer of chemical weapons?" Are we really putting meth on the same legal plane as ricin or sarin gas? C'mon, let's at least [I]pretend[/I] to be going after actual terrorists. As to the law, sodium hypochlorite is toxic, but I don't see anybody bringing charges for not only manufacturing, but [I]actively marketing[/I] the sale of NaClO solution (you'll find it in the laundry aisle; it's called "bleach"). Even [I]water[/I] is toxic in sufficient concentration! Talk about a grossly overbroad law, having only the barest wisp of a nexus to terrorism. As to the seminars to local law enforcement, again, I distinctly remember when they were in the news, but that's been a decade or more ago (under the Bush Administration), so finding those stories is a little tougher now. Here's one story on the topic: [URL]https://www.cbsnews.com/news/terror-laws-used-vs-common-crimes/[/URL] [September 2003 story] See also: Walter Brasch's [I]America's Unpatriotic Acts[/I], p. 75-76. The claims have footnotes for support, but I can't chase them down as the notes pages aren't included in the excerpt on Google: [URL]https://books.google.com/books?id=NH6axRj4HQkC&pg=PA76&lpg=PA76&dq=National+Association+of+Criminal+Defense+Attorneys+PATRIOT+Act+seminars&source=bl&ots=3FVfKP1YIf&sig=X-HTAI-twaUNIRY1BT5pXq7uy38&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiWgJPUkuzYAhVvhq0KHTSSDIQQ6AEIUTAF#v=onepage&q=National%20Association%20of%20Criminal%20Defense%20Attorneys%20PATRIOT%20Act%20seminars&f=false[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
FISA Abuse Memo
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom