Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Florida Moves To Restrict Media Access To Stand Your Ground Case Records
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave70968" data-source="post: 2463282" data-attributes="member: 13624"><p>Journalists don't have any more access to "personal records" than anybody else.</p><p></p><p>Remember, the interest being protected by the First Amendment is the people's right to keep an eye on the actions of government. Being charged with a crime, including the disposition of such charges, is a matter of public interest specifically because it is a governmental act. Yes, there is some balancing to be done to avoid unnecessarily ruining a man's good name (<em>see, e.g.</em> Richad Jewell), but the public <em>definitely</em> needs to know whom the government is charging (or not charging), with what, and how those prosecutions are handled. Hiding those records moves us back in the direction of secret courts, and that's somewhere we really don't want to go. Public trials and such are not just to protect the defendant; they're also to give we, the people, confidence that the court system is working properly. Hide the records and we can't audit our government, with all that implies.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave70968, post: 2463282, member: 13624"] Journalists don't have any more access to "personal records" than anybody else. Remember, the interest being protected by the First Amendment is the people's right to keep an eye on the actions of government. Being charged with a crime, including the disposition of such charges, is a matter of public interest specifically because it is a governmental act. Yes, there is some balancing to be done to avoid unnecessarily ruining a man's good name ([I]see, e.g.[/I] Richad Jewell), but the public [I]definitely[/I] needs to know whom the government is charging (or not charging), with what, and how those prosecutions are handled. Hiding those records moves us back in the direction of secret courts, and that's somewhere we really don't want to go. Public trials and such are not just to protect the defendant; they're also to give we, the people, confidence that the court system is working properly. Hide the records and we can't audit our government, with all that implies. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Florida Moves To Restrict Media Access To Stand Your Ground Case Records
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom