Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Florida - New Permitless Carry for Qualified Citizens Signed into Law - How is this Constitutional Carry?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chuckie" data-source="post: 4010598" data-attributes="member: 42584"><p>Yes, I defend the rights of all people, with some [necessary] restrictions in place. An example is that I defend the right of a person to 'Free Speech' under our Constitutions' First Amendment, but that does not mean a person should be able to scream 'fire' in a crowded movie theater or blatantly threaten someone (especially in a world where another will carry-out that threat).</p><p></p><p>Same with the 2nd Amendment, even though some people definitely SHOULD NOT be allowed to carry weapons despite the " . . . shall not be infringed" mantra that so many defend without any thought about things like whether an individual is capable of taking personal responsibility for having a firearm or if that person even knows the difference between right or wrong.</p><p></p><p>So here is a question for everyone that without thinking for themselves just blissfully follow along like sheep because their peers say so. <strong>Should a person in accordance with 'Constitutional Carry' be allowed to carry a PDW in public even though their eyesight has deteriorated to the point of being almost blind?</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chuckie, post: 4010598, member: 42584"] Yes, I defend the rights of all people, with some [necessary] restrictions in place. An example is that I defend the right of a person to 'Free Speech' under our Constitutions' First Amendment, but that does not mean a person should be able to scream 'fire' in a crowded movie theater or blatantly threaten someone (especially in a world where another will carry-out that threat). Same with the 2nd Amendment, even though some people definitely SHOULD NOT be allowed to carry weapons despite the " . . . shall not be infringed" mantra that so many defend without any thought about things like whether an individual is capable of taking personal responsibility for having a firearm or if that person even knows the difference between right or wrong. So here is a question for everyone that without thinking for themselves just blissfully follow along like sheep because their peers say so. [B]Should a person in accordance with 'Constitutional Carry' be allowed to carry a PDW in public even though their eyesight has deteriorated to the point of being almost blind?[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Florida - New Permitless Carry for Qualified Citizens Signed into Law - How is this Constitutional Carry?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom