Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Almost Jack Burton" data-source="post: 4010644" data-attributes="member: 44915">You really are a jaded holier than thou type.Let&#039;s see here who enacted the NFA, and the AWB? Pretty sure those are/were federal.I asked you a question first which you either didn&#039;t see from that manufactured moral high horse you are sitting on or just ignored because you have come to the realization that your OPINION isn&#039;t getting the back up you thought it would.So to answer your hypothetical question,No regular person can carry a &quot;PDW&quot; given by definition a &quot;PDW&quot; is a select fire sub gun or stocked pistol so that makes your question about as valid as defining an AR-15 as an assault rifle.To further elaborate on that what&#039;s in your all knowing wisdom constitutes &quot;almost blind&quot; given that&#039;s a really broad term?My wife can&#039;t see very well without her glasses so in your opinion, she shouldn&#039;t be allowed the right to defend herself against and attacker.Most acts of violence on a person during a crime are up close and personal, you should know this since you are presenting yourself as a combat veteran and your knowledge is above all.So yes a person who is almost blind should be able to carry a weapon to defend themselves given if they are handicapped they are an easier target for those with bad intentions.But I suppose you just feel they should be euthanized or never leave their house.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Almost Jack Burton, post: 4010644, member: 44915"] You really are a jaded holier than thou type. Let's see here who enacted the NFA, and the AWB? Pretty sure those are/were federal. I asked you a question first which you either didn't see from that manufactured moral high horse you are sitting on or just ignored because you have come to the realization that your OPINION isn't getting the back up you thought it would. So to answer your hypothetical question, No regular person can carry a "PDW" given by definition a "PDW" is a select fire sub gun or stocked pistol so that makes your question about as valid as defining an AR-15 as an assault rifle. To further elaborate on that what's in your all knowing wisdom constitutes "almost blind" given that's a really broad term? My wife can't see very well without her glasses so in your opinion, she shouldn't be allowed the right to defend herself against and attacker. Most acts of violence on a person during a crime are up close and personal, you should know this since you are presenting yourself as a combat veteran and your knowledge is above all. So yes a person who is almost blind should be able to carry a weapon to defend themselves given if they are handicapped they are an easier target for those with bad intentions. But I suppose you just feel they should be euthanized or never leave their house. [/QUOTE]

Verification