Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Florida - New Permitless Carry for Qualified Citizens Signed into Law - How is this Constitutional Carry?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cboss" data-source="post: 4012344" data-attributes="member: 51916"><p>I see both sides of the argument. I think the reason so many people are absolutists to "Shall not be infringed" is because the gun grabbers will always find a way to tweak or reinterpret laws to make everyone someone "who shouldn't have guns" Mentally ill starts to include Combat vets with PTSD, which then includes just combat vets because "They may not have been diagnosed yet". They've been saying the quiet part out loud for years. In California there have been several members of the state legislature openly saying that the end goal is no guns in California. State Senator and gubernatorial candidate <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leland_Yee" target="_blank">Leland Yee</a>, who was later convicted of arms trafficking involving a Muslim terrorist group in the Philippines said: "It is extremely important that individuals in the state of California do not own assault weapons. I mean that is just so crystal clear, there is no debate, no discussion."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cboss, post: 4012344, member: 51916"] I see both sides of the argument. I think the reason so many people are absolutists to "Shall not be infringed" is because the gun grabbers will always find a way to tweak or reinterpret laws to make everyone someone "who shouldn't have guns" Mentally ill starts to include Combat vets with PTSD, which then includes just combat vets because "They may not have been diagnosed yet". They've been saying the quiet part out loud for years. In California there have been several members of the state legislature openly saying that the end goal is no guns in California. State Senator and gubernatorial candidate [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leland_Yee']Leland Yee[/URL], who was later convicted of arms trafficking involving a Muslim terrorist group in the Philippines said: "It is extremely important that individuals in the state of California do not own assault weapons. I mean that is just so crystal clear, there is no debate, no discussion." [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Florida - New Permitless Carry for Qualified Citizens Signed into Law - How is this Constitutional Carry?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom