Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Found On Drudge.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mugsy" data-source="post: 2114394" data-attributes="member: 18914"><p>I think the key issue is one of due process - we generally agree that someone can be declared mentally unfit to own a weapon (or even be on the streets) the real sticking point is what is the process and when does the "accused" get to have a hearing before a judge? And what is the appeal process? A "determination" by some bureaucrat, or even a doctor, without a full open hearing or review seems patently unconstitutional.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mugsy, post: 2114394, member: 18914"] I think the key issue is one of due process - we generally agree that someone can be declared mentally unfit to own a weapon (or even be on the streets) the real sticking point is what is the process and when does the "accused" get to have a hearing before a judge? And what is the appeal process? A "determination" by some bureaucrat, or even a doctor, without a full open hearing or review seems patently unconstitutional. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Found On Drudge.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
