Reply to Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Coded-Dude" data-source="post: 2744956" data-attributes="member: 16918">How do I put this.......  Its been iterated here plenty of times: you certainly have the freedom to do lots of things, but you also have to deal with the repercussions(and those actions can be stupid and reckless)."You agree that there are people committed to kill every one of us including your family....."Yes"....and you think hunters can't protect you? Those hunters being armed citizens?"You believe with 100% certainty that you(the hunter) could dispatch the bear before it maims me or my family after I poke it?As to the Geller situation(i've already stated this), I believe its reckless and stupid to intentionally provoke someone whom you believe will most certainly retaliate when the person doing the provoking isn't willing to protect those they are putting in danger.  We're not talking just talking about political speech here, we are talking about calling out terrorist.  Fortunately only one person was injured and was able to save everyone else, but keep doing it and as Lurker said, eventually they will retaliate with far more aggression and innocent people will get caught in the crossfire.  Yes, we know terrorists want to kill us and they will likely attempt attacks regardless.  Does that simple fact somehow condone giving them a target where innocent people could die?</blockquote>