Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
General Petraeus Forming Gun Control Group with Mark Kelly & Runs Away From Bilderberg Questions
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mugsy" data-source="post: 2884005" data-attributes="member: 18914"><p>Don't be surprised. I was an active duty USAF officer for 24 years and have been an Army civilian for 5 years working directly for general officers and there is a certain strain of thought among some (not all, its a subset) senior leaders, both officer and enlisted, that while guns may be the tools of their trade, only certain folks, i.e.they themselves, are wise enough to decide if and when such should be used. They naturally assume that in order to ensure proper use only folks such as they can be reasonably expected to know the appropriate time and manner to use force. They discount the idea of a normal citizen (or soldier) being trusted to act as a citizen-soldier in a Republic. In most cases it isn't a conscious ideological choice on their part it is more a function of their temper, attitude, and personal ego. </p><p></p><p>These are great Americans in the military but there is a reason we don't want the military making choices for civilians in civil governance.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mugsy, post: 2884005, member: 18914"] Don't be surprised. I was an active duty USAF officer for 24 years and have been an Army civilian for 5 years working directly for general officers and there is a certain strain of thought among some (not all, its a subset) senior leaders, both officer and enlisted, that while guns may be the tools of their trade, only certain folks, i.e.they themselves, are wise enough to decide if and when such should be used. They naturally assume that in order to ensure proper use only folks such as they can be reasonably expected to know the appropriate time and manner to use force. They discount the idea of a normal citizen (or soldier) being trusted to act as a citizen-soldier in a Republic. In most cases it isn't a conscious ideological choice on their part it is more a function of their temper, attitude, and personal ego. These are great Americans in the military but there is a reason we don't want the military making choices for civilians in civil governance. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
General Petraeus Forming Gun Control Group with Mark Kelly & Runs Away From Bilderberg Questions
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom