Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="JD8" data-source="post: 3682837" data-attributes="member: 24">Dawg LOL?&nbsp; How old are you?I understand what you&#039;re saying, you just can&#039;t see the forest for the trees and understand the bigger picture of people assuming their own risk.&nbsp; &quot;Trusting the science&quot; seems a VERY convenient phrase for you.&nbsp; You can mock me all you please, like I said, chess with a pigeon. Again, it seems only know about sports what you obviously read.&nbsp; Trying to relay there&#039;s some sort of difference between accidental vs &quot;part of the game.&quot;&nbsp; I&#039;m not sure if you&#039;re that obtuse or just really have no idea about sports.&nbsp;&nbsp; Basketball injuries (which I never would have guessed) aren&#039;t too far behind football.&nbsp;&nbsp; The risk is still there, and still prevalent.&nbsp; If they all can get CTE or some other injury, and apparently they do.... what&#039;s the difference?&nbsp; &nbsp; Same with several other sports.... soccer...... rugby..... all the others previously mentioned.&nbsp;&nbsp; Either way, the problem with your theory, especially in Oklahoma, is the FACT that somehow magically, you don&#039;t have a bunch of former football players drooling on themselves.&nbsp; Why is that? I get you&#039;re desperate to hold onto that Cigarette strawman argument but it&#039;s retarded.&nbsp; Pun intended.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="JD8, post: 3682837, member: 24"] Dawg LOL? How old are you? I understand what you're saying, you just can't see the forest for the trees and understand the bigger picture of people assuming their own risk. "Trusting the science" seems a VERY convenient phrase for you. You can mock me all you please, like I said, chess with a pigeon. Again, it seems only know about sports what you obviously read. Trying to relay there's some sort of difference between accidental vs "part of the game." I'm not sure if you're that obtuse or just really have no idea about sports. Basketball injuries (which I never would have guessed) aren't too far behind football. The risk is still there, and still prevalent. If they all can get CTE or some other injury, and apparently they do.... what's the difference? Same with several other sports.... soccer...... rugby..... all the others previously mentioned. Either way, the problem with your theory, especially in Oklahoma, is the FACT that somehow magically, you don't have a bunch of former football players drooling on themselves. Why is that? I get you're desperate to hold onto that Cigarette strawman argument but it's retarded. Pun intended. [/QUOTE]

Verification