Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Gop 2012
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="omegis13" data-source="post: 729350" data-attributes="member: 4945"><p><a href="http://www.reason.com/news/show/36650.html" target="_blank">http://www.reason.com/news/show/36650.html</a></p><p></p><p>There's a good start. If I really had a strong desire to find more information for you, I'm sure I could find you tons about the left and racial politics from the 60's forward, but I really find the identity politics of the "progressive era" to be more interesting. You're a big boy though, and I'm sure you know how to use google just as well as I do. I'm sorry if you don't want to accept what I am now writing because it's my personal observation, but historically, progressivism and neo-liberalism have had a nasty problem when it comes to race; they do not approach racial politics with a goal of a colorblind society, and instead push a victim mentality on minorities by treating them as special interest groups. They are not interested in true civil "liberties", but more accurately, civil "privileges". But then again, what else would you really expect from any form of a collectivism, which at it's core, whether in preaching or in practice, holds a philosophy that rights are derived from the State and are kindly granted to the people from it, as opposed to all sovereignty initially and naturally extending from the individual citizen?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="omegis13, post: 729350, member: 4945"] [url]http://www.reason.com/news/show/36650.html[/url] There's a good start. If I really had a strong desire to find more information for you, I'm sure I could find you tons about the left and racial politics from the 60's forward, but I really find the identity politics of the "progressive era" to be more interesting. You're a big boy though, and I'm sure you know how to use google just as well as I do. I'm sorry if you don't want to accept what I am now writing because it's my personal observation, but historically, progressivism and neo-liberalism have had a nasty problem when it comes to race; they do not approach racial politics with a goal of a colorblind society, and instead push a victim mentality on minorities by treating them as special interest groups. They are not interested in true civil "liberties", but more accurately, civil "privileges". But then again, what else would you really expect from any form of a collectivism, which at it's core, whether in preaching or in practice, holds a philosophy that rights are derived from the State and are kindly granted to the people from it, as opposed to all sovereignty initially and naturally extending from the individual citizen? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Gop 2012
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom