Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="excat" data-source="post: 2600361" data-attributes="member: 29449">That made me LOL....<img src="/images/smilies/image1047.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":laughup:" title="Image1047&nbsp; &nbsp; :laughup:" data-shortname=":laughup:" />I would think it would all depend on the delivery of the information. If you went in acting just as arrogant and hot headed as he sounded as to being, it&#039;s just going to be a rinse and repeat as he will have already written you off.If you went in slightly apologetic (even though you did nothing wrong, it&#039;s a psychology tactic), and told him that your conversation with him caused you to doubt yourself so you wanted to verify your information, and share your findings with him, he &quot;may&quot; be more perceptive to the information you have to share with him. I don&#039;t think it would be a waste of time though. Everyone deserves the benefit of doubt at least once.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="excat, post: 2600361, member: 29449"] That made me LOL....:laughup: I would think it would all depend on the delivery of the information. If you went in acting just as arrogant and hot headed as he sounded as to being, it's just going to be a rinse and repeat as he will have already written you off. If you went in slightly apologetic (even though you did nothing wrong, it's a psychology tactic), and told him that your conversation with him caused you to doubt yourself so you wanted to verify your information, and share your findings with him, he "may" be more perceptive to the information you have to share with him. I don't think it would be a waste of time though. Everyone deserves the benefit of doubt at least once. [/QUOTE]

Verification