Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
Stupid Stuff
Gun bunnies... do they know anything about guns? (No nudes)
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jakeman" data-source="post: 3467696" data-attributes="member: 10690"><p>Could be, maybe not, but I don't care. It's a matter of taste. Just because some people find it repulsive, or stupid, I believe that says more about them than it does the wearer of the tat. Now, I believe just like everything else, moderation is key. If they are covered in them and have them on their face & neck, I don't believe that shows very good judgement, but like you, in the end it's not for me to judge. Then again, if I'm the hiring manager and they are applying for a job that faces the client or public, then I get to judge. </p><p></p><p>I've know some folks that had full sleeves that are the nicest people you'd ever want to meet. You can't judge a book by it's cover. It isn't the tats that don't make someone likeable or approachable or vice versa. It's the person. I'd never not be someone's friend because they had a bunch of what I considered ill advisable body ink. One of the biggest douche bags I know doesn't have a single tat. One of the nicest guys I know, he's also very successful in the corporate world, has a 3/4 sleeve. Back when I was dating, I'd never not date a girl because she had a tat, except maybe a face or visible neck tat. </p><p></p><p>Different strokes for different folks, but again, those that get all ****** about people wearing tats are a little more suspect to me than folks that have a lot of tats. </p><p></p><p>Back to the pics please!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jakeman, post: 3467696, member: 10690"] Could be, maybe not, but I don't care. It's a matter of taste. Just because some people find it repulsive, or stupid, I believe that says more about them than it does the wearer of the tat. Now, I believe just like everything else, moderation is key. If they are covered in them and have them on their face & neck, I don't believe that shows very good judgement, but like you, in the end it's not for me to judge. Then again, if I'm the hiring manager and they are applying for a job that faces the client or public, then I get to judge. I've know some folks that had full sleeves that are the nicest people you'd ever want to meet. You can't judge a book by it's cover. It isn't the tats that don't make someone likeable or approachable or vice versa. It's the person. I'd never not be someone's friend because they had a bunch of what I considered ill advisable body ink. One of the biggest douche bags I know doesn't have a single tat. One of the nicest guys I know, he's also very successful in the corporate world, has a 3/4 sleeve. Back when I was dating, I'd never not date a girl because she had a tat, except maybe a face or visible neck tat. Different strokes for different folks, but again, those that get all ****** about people wearing tats are a little more suspect to me than folks that have a lot of tats. Back to the pics please! [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
Stupid Stuff
Gun bunnies... do they know anything about guns? (No nudes)
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom