Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 2267320" data-attributes="member: 1132">Negative. If the shoot is ruled a good shoot, you&#039;re immune from civil suit.About the only think I could think of civilly would be a business owner that filed for loss of revenue for the period in which the business was closed for the investigation, due to your actions. As posted, the intent of the law was the exact opposite of the 30.06 laws in Texas. They wanted to make sure persons exercising their rights under the law didn&#039;t inadvertently commit a crime that could get them barred from carrying. The trespass portion is retaining property owner rights sufficiently and balances the right of the individual. They can always have the popo advise you of criminal trespass after their investigation is concluded. I&#039;d advise you to leave when released and not speak to the property owner further. <img src="/images/smilies/smile.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 2267320, member: 1132"] Negative. If the shoot is ruled a good shoot, you're immune from civil suit. About the only think I could think of civilly would be a business owner that filed for loss of revenue for the period in which the business was closed for the investigation, due to your actions. As posted, the intent of the law was the exact opposite of the 30.06 laws in Texas. They wanted to make sure persons exercising their rights under the law didn't inadvertently commit a crime that could get them barred from carrying. The trespass portion is retaining property owner rights sufficiently and balances the right of the individual. They can always have the popo advise you of criminal trespass after their investigation is concluded. I'd advise you to leave when released and not speak to the property owner further. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification