Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Gun owner against the SDA.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jarhead983" data-source="post: 1011595" data-attributes="member: 7129"><p>I fully believe that the gem dealer is an idiot. You can't shoot after the threat of grave bodily injury or death has passed. I totally disagree with this statement. Other than the mentally incompetent, there should be no gauge to forbid anyone from the right of bearing of arms prior to them proving themselves unworthy.</p><p></p><p>Anytime guidelines are suggested and implemented, they're sole purpose is to limit access, not encourage. Every person or entity that has written laws or set guidelines has ensured that they can be included as one of the anointed and anyone else just below their ability is eliminated.</p><p></p><p>I know many people that I would not be comfortable with them having a weapon. I have seen quite a few of them at the range. I will not let my bias toward them turn into a reason to discriminate against them. It does force me to become better at my shooting skills and my awareness of whats going on around me</p><p></p><p>Once you cross the line of endangerment of others, then you relinquish your right. There will always be concerns of safety, but I don't think many will dispute the fact that we are not safer now, even after all of these years of limiting gun ownership in the name of safety.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jarhead983, post: 1011595, member: 7129"] I fully believe that the gem dealer is an idiot. You can't shoot after the threat of grave bodily injury or death has passed. I totally disagree with this statement. Other than the mentally incompetent, there should be no gauge to forbid anyone from the right of bearing of arms prior to them proving themselves unworthy. Anytime guidelines are suggested and implemented, they're sole purpose is to limit access, not encourage. Every person or entity that has written laws or set guidelines has ensured that they can be included as one of the anointed and anyone else just below their ability is eliminated. I know many people that I would not be comfortable with them having a weapon. I have seen quite a few of them at the range. I will not let my bias toward them turn into a reason to discriminate against them. It does force me to become better at my shooting skills and my awareness of whats going on around me Once you cross the line of endangerment of others, then you relinquish your right. There will always be concerns of safety, but I don't think many will dispute the fact that we are not safer now, even after all of these years of limiting gun ownership in the name of safety. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Gun owner against the SDA.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom