Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Have you considered purchasing wearable body armor?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fitz-" data-source="post: 4182611" data-attributes="member: 50525"><p>Then ya, you might want to revisit those, 3+ is going to vary by manufacturer since it's a made up level. More simply put usually was it bridged the big gap between 3 and 4, essentially supposedly being good for some of the lighter AP/green tip stuff. But now I'm getting hazy here, the big deal of why 4 > 3"+" was 3+ I thought still failed m80 ball usually due to backface deformation. (And then things get really confusing with some folks trying to wear a light weight special threat or 3+ plate with some soft armor reinventing essentially army IOTV and making an in conjunction with combination. The issue, is all of these are kinda red neck back yard tested/wargamed and not things that have gone through full certification process.</p><p></p><p>Should look up the new ratings though, it's sorta simpler and much clearer generally speaking. I just read it once so far and forgot so will need to re-read it a few more times until it sinks in.</p><p></p><p>But from what your saying you sound mainly concerned with pistols, and if you want concealed, then ya your more in 3A area which is soft concealable armor, any of the 3+'s are going to be hard plates unless you are shelling out a fortune for some questionable safe life or some of those over advertised plans that have renamed dragonscale.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fitz-, post: 4182611, member: 50525"] Then ya, you might want to revisit those, 3+ is going to vary by manufacturer since it's a made up level. More simply put usually was it bridged the big gap between 3 and 4, essentially supposedly being good for some of the lighter AP/green tip stuff. But now I'm getting hazy here, the big deal of why 4 > 3"+" was 3+ I thought still failed m80 ball usually due to backface deformation. (And then things get really confusing with some folks trying to wear a light weight special threat or 3+ plate with some soft armor reinventing essentially army IOTV and making an in conjunction with combination. The issue, is all of these are kinda red neck back yard tested/wargamed and not things that have gone through full certification process. Should look up the new ratings though, it's sorta simpler and much clearer generally speaking. I just read it once so far and forgot so will need to re-read it a few more times until it sinks in. But from what your saying you sound mainly concerned with pistols, and if you want concealed, then ya your more in 3A area which is soft concealable armor, any of the 3+'s are going to be hard plates unless you are shelling out a fortune for some questionable safe life or some of those over advertised plans that have renamed dragonscale. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Have you considered purchasing wearable body armor?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom