Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Haven't heard much about this case
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JonN06" data-source="post: 2440995" data-attributes="member: 17207"><p>I'm not saying that the woman is/is not lying. What I am saying is the way the prosecutors worded that is not okay. "They also argued that Davidson was conveniently scary to April. The two had sex after she claimed he abused her..." I'm not saying that 100 % of the time women have sex with people that are abusive. What I am saying is that when a woman is fearful of an abuser, they will do anything to avoid a conflict that would result in abuse. They will try to cater to the abuser to avoid the abuse. This could mean having dinner on the table the minute the abuser gets home, it could mean sex at the abusers request, various other needs/wants of the abuser. </p><p></p><p>I'm not saying this case isn't fishy. It is... Just from a psychological perspective, a woman having sex with a man after he has abused her does not mean abuse was not present in the relationship.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JonN06, post: 2440995, member: 17207"] I'm not saying that the woman is/is not lying. What I am saying is the way the prosecutors worded that is not okay. "They also argued that Davidson was conveniently scary to April. The two had sex after she claimed he abused her..." I'm not saying that 100 % of the time women have sex with people that are abusive. What I am saying is that when a woman is fearful of an abuser, they will do anything to avoid a conflict that would result in abuse. They will try to cater to the abuser to avoid the abuse. This could mean having dinner on the table the minute the abuser gets home, it could mean sex at the abusers request, various other needs/wants of the abuser. I'm not saying this case isn't fishy. It is... Just from a psychological perspective, a woman having sex with a man after he has abused her does not mean abuse was not present in the relationship. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Haven't heard much about this case
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom