Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
HB 3354 - Open Carry
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vvvvvvv" data-source="post: 1128654" data-attributes="member: 5151"><p>After doing some reading from the Journals, he only served notice of intent to motion to reconsider. </p><p></p><p>Under House Rule 9.10a, a Member must serve notice of motion to reconsider immediately after the Third or Fourth Reading vote, but a motion to reconsider may not be made on the same day without a vote to suspend the rule (which there wasn't).</p><p></p><p>Under 9.10b, they have until Monday (three legislative days) to vote on the motion to reconsider by simple majority. On Wednesday and Thursday, only the Member who served notice can make the motion to reconsider, but Monday anyone can (9.10c).</p><p></p><p>If they don't make the motion or they make the motion and the vote fails on Monday, then under 6.8(a)(4) it is considered passed.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.okhouse.gov/Documents/Rules/52/ENROLLED%20HOUSE%20RESOLUTION%201005.pdf" target="_blank">Oklahoma House Rules (PDF)</a></p><p></p><p>ETA: By the way, if anyone was wary about McCullough's position with him not being present, the May 5 Journal has this entry:</p><p></p><p>Representative McCullough asked that the Journal reflect that had he been present in</p><p>the Chamber on Tuesday, May 4, he would have voted aye on HB 3354, which was the</p><p>order.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vvvvvvv, post: 1128654, member: 5151"] After doing some reading from the Journals, he only served notice of intent to motion to reconsider. Under House Rule 9.10a, a Member must serve notice of motion to reconsider immediately after the Third or Fourth Reading vote, but a motion to reconsider may not be made on the same day without a vote to suspend the rule (which there wasn't). Under 9.10b, they have until Monday (three legislative days) to vote on the motion to reconsider by simple majority. On Wednesday and Thursday, only the Member who served notice can make the motion to reconsider, but Monday anyone can (9.10c). If they don't make the motion or they make the motion and the vote fails on Monday, then under 6.8(a)(4) it is considered passed. [URL="http://www.okhouse.gov/Documents/Rules/52/ENROLLED%20HOUSE%20RESOLUTION%201005.pdf"]Oklahoma House Rules (PDF)[/URL] ETA: By the way, if anyone was wary about McCullough's position with him not being present, the May 5 Journal has this entry: Representative McCullough asked that the Journal reflect that had he been present in the Chamber on Tuesday, May 4, he would have voted aye on HB 3354, which was the order. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
HB 3354 - Open Carry
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
