Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
HB 3354 - Open Carry
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="1shot(bob)" data-source="post: 1137962" data-attributes="member: 1657"><p>How many of us actually believe he reads this stuff? And how many think a staffer sees it, decides if it's for or against, then puts it in the appropriate pile and marks a 'yay' or 'nay' on a tally sheet and moves on. </p><p>I seriously doubt that any finely worded or well thought out reply is treated any differently than the simple. "Brad, you blew it" letter.</p><p>Not meaning to dissuade anyone from writing a nicely worded letter, but . . . . .</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="1shot(bob), post: 1137962, member: 1657"] How many of us actually believe he reads this stuff? And how many think a staffer sees it, decides if it's for or against, then puts it in the appropriate pile and marks a 'yay' or 'nay' on a tally sheet and moves on. I seriously doubt that any finely worded or well thought out reply is treated any differently than the simple. "Brad, you blew it" letter. Not meaning to dissuade anyone from writing a nicely worded letter, but . . . . . [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
HB 3354 - Open Carry
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
