Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Hb1059
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hrdware" data-source="post: 2092882" data-attributes="member: 24475"><p>HB1059 is scheduled for a committee hearing on 2/6 10:30 am in room 432-A of the capitol.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us/cf_pdf/2013-14%20INT/hB/HB1059%20INT.PDF" target="_blank">Text of Measure</a></p><p></p><p>Some people think this may be an anti-OC bill, but I don't read it that way. I think this tries to eliminate intentional flashing of a concealed firearm.</p><p></p><p>Other things in this bill include removing city, state and local government buildings from the prohibited places list unless they provide their own security and metal detectors. It removes meetings of government officials from the prohibited places list. It removes schools to allow for the parking lot exemption. </p><p></p><p>This bill would remove parks and recreational areas from the protected from being a prohibited place list. I don't see this as an issue as the state has preemption and if state law doesn't prohibit it, then it is OK in those areas.</p><p></p><p>This bill would also require businesses who don't want firearms in their buildings to post signage...no more verbal warnings. Also clarifies that carrying past a sign is trespass not a violation of the SDA.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hrdware, post: 2092882, member: 24475"] HB1059 is scheduled for a committee hearing on 2/6 10:30 am in room 432-A of the capitol. [URL="http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us/cf_pdf/2013-14%20INT/hB/HB1059%20INT.PDF"]Text of Measure[/URL] Some people think this may be an anti-OC bill, but I don't read it that way. I think this tries to eliminate intentional flashing of a concealed firearm. Other things in this bill include removing city, state and local government buildings from the prohibited places list unless they provide their own security and metal detectors. It removes meetings of government officials from the prohibited places list. It removes schools to allow for the parking lot exemption. This bill would remove parks and recreational areas from the protected from being a prohibited place list. I don't see this as an issue as the state has preemption and if state law doesn't prohibit it, then it is OK in those areas. This bill would also require businesses who don't want firearms in their buildings to post signage...no more verbal warnings. Also clarifies that carrying past a sign is trespass not a violation of the SDA. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Hb1059
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
