Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Hb1062
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rawhide" data-source="post: 2100245" data-attributes="member: 3448"><p>Looks like feel good legislation to me. </p><p></p><p>Considering the environment teachers work in, I am not opposed to situation specific training as a matter of responsibility. Training I would seek regardless of the law. The objective, as I see it, is to allow teachers to protect themselves and the students on their campus. Requiring teachers to be reserve law enforcement is unnecessary. Teachers in Utah have been carrying for more than a decade with zero incidents. </p><p></p><p>Wouldn't the state or school district paying for such training effectively obligate trained teachers to be on call to handle all kinds of situations unintended by this legislation? There are many teachers who probably could not, for physical reasons due to age or disability, pass or complete such training but could most certainly confront and prevent an active shooter from doing more harm. I want to be able to respond to a deadly threat as effectively as possible, not be on call as a part-time resource officer or security guard.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rawhide, post: 2100245, member: 3448"] Looks like feel good legislation to me. Considering the environment teachers work in, I am not opposed to situation specific training as a matter of responsibility. Training I would seek regardless of the law. The objective, as I see it, is to allow teachers to protect themselves and the students on their campus. Requiring teachers to be reserve law enforcement is unnecessary. Teachers in Utah have been carrying for more than a decade with zero incidents. Wouldn't the state or school district paying for such training effectively obligate trained teachers to be on call to handle all kinds of situations unintended by this legislation? There are many teachers who probably could not, for physical reasons due to age or disability, pass or complete such training but could most certainly confront and prevent an active shooter from doing more harm. I want to be able to respond to a deadly threat as effectively as possible, not be on call as a part-time resource officer or security guard. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Hb1062
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom