Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="gerhard1" data-source="post: 2861641" data-attributes="member: 5391">You raise a very good point here.&nbsp; Please note that the statute does not say that the license has to be issued by the state in which the school is located, it only says that the individual must be licensed by the state in which the school is located.&nbsp; If Kansas honors SDA licenses&nbsp; (and they do), are we not then licensed by Kansas to carry? While I think that the statutory language backs me up here, I do concede that the courts don&#039;t look at it like this. There are a couple of possibilities for relief here, however and one of them is for states like Kansas and Oklahoma to amend their respective laws to permit out of state residents to apply for and receive CCW licenses. The other is to revise the GFSZA to specify that OOS CCW licenses are honored.&nbsp; I think, however, that under a Democratic Administration that revising the GFSZA would be next to impossible.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="gerhard1, post: 2861641, member: 5391"] You raise a very good point here. Please note that the statute does not say that the license has to be [B][I]issued[/I][/B] by the state in which the school is located, it only says that the individual must be licensed by the state in which the school is located. If Kansas honors SDA licenses (and they do), are we not then licensed by Kansas to carry? While I think that the statutory language backs me up here, I do concede that the courts don't look at it like this. There are a couple of possibilities for relief here, however and one of them is for states like Kansas and Oklahoma to amend their respective laws to permit out of state residents to apply for and receive CCW licenses. The other is to revise the GFSZA to specify that OOS CCW licenses are honored. I think, however, that under a Democratic Administration that revising the GFSZA would be next to impossible. [/QUOTE]

Verification