Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
heads up to business owners SQ766
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SoonerATC" data-source="post: 1947244" data-attributes="member: 9576"><p>I don't remember doing that. In any case, businesses do benefit from police and fire departments, but I believe those are paid for by individuals through sales taxes and property taxes (which the business pays as well). So not only does the owner and the employees of the business fund these services as individuals, the business itself also gets burdened. Why should businesses be taxed for a service that's already being paid for through other sources? </p><p></p><p>My original argument was against taxing "intangibles". That's ridiculous and was the point of my contention with this proposed state question.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SoonerATC, post: 1947244, member: 9576"] I don't remember doing that. In any case, businesses do benefit from police and fire departments, but I believe those are paid for by individuals through sales taxes and property taxes (which the business pays as well). So not only does the owner and the employees of the business fund these services as individuals, the business itself also gets burdened. Why should businesses be taxed for a service that's already being paid for through other sources? My original argument was against taxing "intangibles". That's ridiculous and was the point of my contention with this proposed state question. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
heads up to business owners SQ766
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom