Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Competitions & Upcoming Events
Heartland Match Oct 17th!
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="David E" data-source="post: 1334501" data-attributes="member: 1013"><p>Let's say we had 26 shooters. 4 of them wanted to shoot a second gun. What would the time difference be by allowing that, or if we had 30 shooters? It should be exactly the same.</p><p></p><p>If we get 20 people, then why not let 4-5 of them, (up to 12) shoot twice?</p><p></p><p>The bottom line is, the max number of shooters will be set at 32. If we get 32 people wanting to shoot, NO ONE is going to be allowed to shoot a second time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="David E, post: 1334501, member: 1013"] Let's say we had 26 shooters. 4 of them wanted to shoot a second gun. What would the time difference be by allowing that, or if we had 30 shooters? It should be exactly the same. If we get 20 people, then why not let 4-5 of them, (up to 12) shoot twice? The bottom line is, the max number of shooters will be set at 32. If we get 32 people wanting to shoot, NO ONE is going to be allowed to shoot a second time. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Competitions & Upcoming Events
Heartland Match Oct 17th!
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom