Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Hell has frozen over
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Werewolf" data-source="post: 2023243" data-attributes="member: 239"><p>Of course it is possible to have varying opinions. But quite often it can be non-sensical and/or impractical.</p><p></p><p>Someone explain to me how being socially liberal while being fiscally conservative at the same time is possible.</p><p></p><p><strong>EDIT:</strong> <em>It appears that as some have pointed out that the definition of socially liberal is the crux of the matter. Those that believe that one can be socially liberal and fiscally conservative hang on a definition that is focused on rights. I can buy that. What I cannot agree with is their contention that financing programs that support social issues can be divorced from the definition. Rights are but one aspect of social liberalism.</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Werewolf, post: 2023243, member: 239"] Of course it is possible to have varying opinions. But quite often it can be non-sensical and/or impractical. Someone explain to me how being socially liberal while being fiscally conservative at the same time is possible. [B]EDIT:[/B] [I]It appears that as some have pointed out that the definition of socially liberal is the crux of the matter. Those that believe that one can be socially liberal and fiscally conservative hang on a definition that is focused on rights. I can buy that. What I cannot agree with is their contention that financing programs that support social issues can be divorced from the definition. Rights are but one aspect of social liberalism.[/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Hell has frozen over
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
