Reply to Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Message: <blockquote data-quote="sh00ter" data-source="post: 2044048" data-attributes="member: 24531">They also want to ban PUMP shotguns people...no only a classic hunting gun, but perhaps the 1st or 2nd choice nation-wide for home defense...this is not about "assault" weapons..this is about disarming the public. Eventually even single-shot .22LR will be banned...then pellet guns.Think about it this way...in the 1780's, there were farmers that owned cannons..."to keep and bear arms" means all arms...BUT...in order to be pragmatic, we have made 85% of modern weapons technology illegal for the average Joe (perhpas rightfully so due to risk of heavy weapons falling into the wrong hands?). We only can legally own small arms and semi-auto at that; no automatics unless extra vetting process. So ask your liberal friends this...IF THEY HAVE ALREADY BANNED 85% OF MODERN WEAPONRY, WHY DO THEY NEED TO KEEP GOING UNLESS THE AGENDA IS TO DISARM US COMPLETELY? I have REPUBLICANS I know who want to ban "assault rifles" and think that is was a "machine gun" used in the recent tragedy. I say that if the Constitution says "arms" they meant whatever modern technology was...they were not stupid...they knew weapons would advance. So the fact all the real bad weapons are banned (which again, Mr. G-man, perhaps rightfully so), then why must the other 15% of weaponry be also banned??? We are down to semi-auto small arms and that is nothing against oppression with a modern military so you control freaks need not fear the 15% remaining that is legal...okay rant over LOL...that is just my opinion.</blockquote>

Verification