Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Here's what your single payer healthcare funding would look like.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frederick" data-source="post: 3713119" data-attributes="member: 17825"><p>Increased medicaid enrollment is a good thing, right? I mean, more coverage for people without it....</p><p>Higher healthcare costs? i think costs were trending upward for decades before ACA....</p><p>[SPOILER]</p><p><img src="https://www.vumc.org/health-policy/sites/default/files/public_files/MBB-ACA%20at%2010-Health%20Affairs-Feb2020-01.png" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p>[/SPOILER]</p><p></p><p>yes, i'd say it improved it for those who did not have coverage; those who now receive medicaid, and those who work at smaller companies who dont provide benefits. when i worked for a small plumbing company, i had no benefits at all but the ACA gave me nearly-free coverage through the marketplace... otherwise what you say is true. Part of the benefit of the pre-ACA model was that as a younger, healthier person, it was much, much cheaper. Now that the insurance companies can't deny the unhealthy and chronically ill coverage, the costs have gone up significantly for us healthier folks. So it's really a matter of whether or not you agree with the principle that the young and healthy producers in society should subsidize those who cannot afford it or who have chronic illnesses via higher premiums.....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frederick, post: 3713119, member: 17825"] Increased medicaid enrollment is a good thing, right? I mean, more coverage for people without it.... Higher healthcare costs? i think costs were trending upward for decades before ACA.... [SPOILER] [IMG]https://www.vumc.org/health-policy/sites/default/files/public_files/MBB-ACA%20at%2010-Health%20Affairs-Feb2020-01.png[/IMG] [/SPOILER] yes, i'd say it improved it for those who did not have coverage; those who now receive medicaid, and those who work at smaller companies who dont provide benefits. when i worked for a small plumbing company, i had no benefits at all but the ACA gave me nearly-free coverage through the marketplace... otherwise what you say is true. Part of the benefit of the pre-ACA model was that as a younger, healthier person, it was much, much cheaper. Now that the insurance companies can't deny the unhealthy and chronically ill coverage, the costs have gone up significantly for us healthier folks. So it's really a matter of whether or not you agree with the principle that the young and healthy producers in society should subsidize those who cannot afford it or who have chronic illnesses via higher premiums..... [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Here's what your single payer healthcare funding would look like.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom