Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
High end AR’s, diminishing returns, and reliability.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HoLeChit" data-source="post: 4069070" data-attributes="member: 35036"><p>I honestly thought of you when I was browsing the Larue website. According to the website: </p><p></p><p>I said "man, swampratt would get on the high end train if he had an AR that shot under a half moa".</p><p></p><p>One thing I find really interesting is that they said at the 25-26 minute mark the manufacturing numbers. 800 rifles a day and over 5000 serialized parts? Annually that 292000 rifles and 1825000 serialized parts... Makes me wonder if the QC complaints are simply due to the number of weapons made. For example, if you look at FN's .gov contracts, they have been built +/- 300,000 rifles since 2015, an average of 78 rifles per day, since 2015. granted that's just .gov contracts, and not other product lines or civilian sales. I am by no means saying PSA is jUsT aS GuD, but maybe if comparing PSA to say, BCM/SOLGW, maybe the QC issues are blown out of proportion due to them making vastly more weapons than other guys in the market? After all, 2% out of spec of over 2 million units if an awful lot more than 2% out of spec of 10,000 units (hypothetically, I can't actually find any real production numbers for quality builders) per year.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HoLeChit, post: 4069070, member: 35036"] I honestly thought of you when I was browsing the Larue website. According to the website: I said "man, swampratt would get on the high end train if he had an AR that shot under a half moa". One thing I find really interesting is that they said at the 25-26 minute mark the manufacturing numbers. 800 rifles a day and over 5000 serialized parts? Annually that 292000 rifles and 1825000 serialized parts... Makes me wonder if the QC complaints are simply due to the number of weapons made. For example, if you look at FN's .gov contracts, they have been built +/- 300,000 rifles since 2015, an average of 78 rifles per day, since 2015. granted that's just .gov contracts, and not other product lines or civilian sales. I am by no means saying PSA is jUsT aS GuD, but maybe if comparing PSA to say, BCM/SOLGW, maybe the QC issues are blown out of proportion due to them making vastly more weapons than other guys in the market? After all, 2% out of spec of over 2 million units if an awful lot more than 2% out of spec of 10,000 units (hypothetically, I can't actually find any real production numbers for quality builders) per year. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
High end AR’s, diminishing returns, and reliability.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom