Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Holder limits seized-asset sharing process that split billions w/ local, state police
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="_CY_" data-source="post: 2883718" data-attributes="member: 7629"><p>thanks very much for your first hand information. to me ANY seizure without due process is a violation of the Forth Amendment. if this is correct, it's not possible for civil seizures on the road to be legal. </p><p></p><p>when would civil seizure be "properly" used? </p><p></p><p>====</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><strong>Fourth Amendment</strong></span></p><p>The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="_CY_, post: 2883718, member: 7629"] thanks very much for your first hand information. to me ANY seizure without due process is a violation of the Forth Amendment. if this is correct, it's not possible for civil seizures on the road to be legal. when would civil seizure be "properly" used? ==== [SIZE=4][B]Fourth Amendment[/B][/SIZE] The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Holder limits seized-asset sharing process that split billions w/ local, state police
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom