Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Holder limits seized-asset sharing process that split billions w/ local, state police
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Foghorn" data-source="post: 2883737" data-attributes="member: 8834"><p>I've been involved in several siezures, all resulted in criminal charges.</p><p></p><p>In several of the cases the subjects had trafficking weight of narcotics and large amounts of cash (over 20k).</p><p></p><p>In another subject had only a large amount of cash (elaborate electronic false compartment) but acknowledged under Miranda he was transporting money for a well known narcotics group.</p><p></p><p>I'm perfectly comfortable with these seizures.</p><p></p><p>I've let money roll on several occasions (more than my yearly salary on a few) because I didn't think I could make the case in court, personally I'd rather lose on the highway than in court. </p><p></p><p>I've said before that asset forfiture needs to be reformed, I just think that loveless' plan is not the right path.</p><p></p><p>Hope this answered your questions..</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Foghorn, post: 2883737, member: 8834"] I've been involved in several siezures, all resulted in criminal charges. In several of the cases the subjects had trafficking weight of narcotics and large amounts of cash (over 20k). In another subject had only a large amount of cash (elaborate electronic false compartment) but acknowledged under Miranda he was transporting money for a well known narcotics group. I'm perfectly comfortable with these seizures. I've let money roll on several occasions (more than my yearly salary on a few) because I didn't think I could make the case in court, personally I'd rather lose on the highway than in court. I've said before that asset forfiture needs to be reformed, I just think that loveless' plan is not the right path. Hope this answered your questions.. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Holder limits seized-asset sharing process that split billions w/ local, state police
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom