Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Firearm Training
How do you train?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gerhard1" data-source="post: 3723167" data-attributes="member: 5391"><p>Agreed, it is real, but I might caution that many still believe in the hierarchy of deadliness myth. That is a bludgeon is not as deadly as a knife and a knife is not as deadly as a gun. Some folks believe that a fight has to be 'fair' and think that the use of a firearm against a person armed with an edged or impact weapon is excessive and the use of deadly force against fists and feet is therefore beyond the pale. We know that this is nonsense, but not everyone on a jury thinks like us, Not all judges are known for the soundness of their logic either.</p><p></p><p>Massad Ayoob has said that disparity of force is a murky legal concept and I think that there are too many variables and it is too untested for it to be a dependable defense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gerhard1, post: 3723167, member: 5391"] Agreed, it is real, but I might caution that many still believe in the hierarchy of deadliness myth. That is a bludgeon is not as deadly as a knife and a knife is not as deadly as a gun. Some folks believe that a fight has to be 'fair' and think that the use of a firearm against a person armed with an edged or impact weapon is excessive and the use of deadly force against fists and feet is therefore beyond the pale. We know that this is nonsense, but not everyone on a jury thinks like us, Not all judges are known for the soundness of their logic either. Massad Ayoob has said that disparity of force is a murky legal concept and I think that there are too many variables and it is too untested for it to be a dependable defense. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Firearm Training
How do you train?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom