Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
How much ammo do you keep on hand?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sh00ter" data-source="post: 2051190" data-attributes="member: 24531"><p>I meant no offense...what I meant was, the citizen militia would not be comprised of "early 90's" extremists...I mentioned some blue collar trades too in my quick list of examples...I meant vetted, respectable people...like volunteer firemen, etc...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well I answered this in one of my posts above...I mean that everything from full-auto small arms all the way up to nukes are essentially banned for the general public (which basically covers 85% of all modern weaponry)...YOU can't own an armed tank, or Stinger missile, or for the most part claymores, etc...and the few things beyond standard semi-auto guns you can own require you to pay a tax stamp and jump through extra hoops (which i understand)...essentially my plan was to try and uphold the constitution and also not have any new gun laws...I was telling the gubbermint that "I understand" why they ban F-16's for Donald Trump or RPG's for me...BUT, we should still have armories for citizens of the well-regulated militia in case the SHTF...hell, you never know...in a Red Dawn scenario, the Army might need help, AND that since 85% of all modern weaponry is essentially banned, then the liberals do not need to go after semi-auto guns which is the remaining 15% of kinds of weapons.</p><p></p><p>The semi-auto was invented in the 19th century so right now, the BEST the avg Joe can get access to under current gun laws is 19th century technology...No need to ban that too....just enforce existing gun laws except change the law to let us have citizen armories and I think it would be the best compromise to uphold the 2nd amendment in a country of 315 million people and be pragmatic...The govt has drones and tanks and we have access to 19th century weaponry only...for them to want to take us to 18th century technology (hunting rifles only, which is what liberals want) is only about control and not public safety in my opinion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sh00ter, post: 2051190, member: 24531"] I meant no offense...what I meant was, the citizen militia would not be comprised of "early 90's" extremists...I mentioned some blue collar trades too in my quick list of examples...I meant vetted, respectable people...like volunteer firemen, etc... Well I answered this in one of my posts above...I mean that everything from full-auto small arms all the way up to nukes are essentially banned for the general public (which basically covers 85% of all modern weaponry)...YOU can't own an armed tank, or Stinger missile, or for the most part claymores, etc...and the few things beyond standard semi-auto guns you can own require you to pay a tax stamp and jump through extra hoops (which i understand)...essentially my plan was to try and uphold the constitution and also not have any new gun laws...I was telling the gubbermint that "I understand" why they ban F-16's for Donald Trump or RPG's for me...BUT, we should still have armories for citizens of the well-regulated militia in case the SHTF...hell, you never know...in a Red Dawn scenario, the Army might need help, AND that since 85% of all modern weaponry is essentially banned, then the liberals do not need to go after semi-auto guns which is the remaining 15% of kinds of weapons. The semi-auto was invented in the 19th century so right now, the BEST the avg Joe can get access to under current gun laws is 19th century technology...No need to ban that too....just enforce existing gun laws except change the law to let us have citizen armories and I think it would be the best compromise to uphold the 2nd amendment in a country of 315 million people and be pragmatic...The govt has drones and tanks and we have access to 19th century weaponry only...for them to want to take us to 18th century technology (hunting rifles only, which is what liberals want) is only about control and not public safety in my opinion. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
How much ammo do you keep on hand?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
