Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
How the hell are Executive Orders constitutional?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="freeranger" data-source="post: 1986881" data-attributes="member: 25733"><p>The heads up on VM is duly noted. As for the SC, I should have clarified that it is only the final arbiter on laws made "in pursuance thereof" of the enumerated powers. Many Federalists assauged the fear of the ratifiers that powers not delegated were retained by the states and people. Any law not enumerated, according to the historical records and debates, is null and void.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="freeranger, post: 1986881, member: 25733"] The heads up on VM is duly noted. As for the SC, I should have clarified that it is only the final arbiter on laws made "in pursuance thereof" of the enumerated powers. Many Federalists assauged the fear of the ratifiers that powers not delegated were retained by the states and people. Any law not enumerated, according to the historical records and debates, is null and void. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
How the hell are Executive Orders constitutional?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom