Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Huntng - for or against and why?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="r00s7a" data-source="post: 2678767" data-attributes="member: 9675"><p>Anti-anti-hunting vote here. I can understand if someone does not want to hunt and remains neutral. What I don't understand is the anti-hunting sentiment. "Man" started hunting roughly two million years ago. That's a long time. This was our means of survival and contributed significantly to the development of modern man. Hunting has been a necessity ever since, up until very recently. If you said man has not HAD to hunt for the last 100 years, that would probably be generous, but we'll say 100 years. 100 years in the last 2 million comes out to .005% of our existence that we have had the luxury of stores providing meat so that we were not required to hunt to survive. I cannot wrap my mind around how something that has gone on for 99.995% of our existence on this planet, the key to our survival, and is now considered barbaric by the anti-hunting crowd. Then you look at the methods by which the anti-hunters obtain their meat (i.e. factory farming), and we are the ones that are considered cruel? Being a hunter is continuing the methods to survive that have gone on for millions and millions of years. There is no shame in that. Anyone that opposes hunting as a means of survival is nothing short of ignorant of the big picture.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="r00s7a, post: 2678767, member: 9675"] Anti-anti-hunting vote here. I can understand if someone does not want to hunt and remains neutral. What I don't understand is the anti-hunting sentiment. "Man" started hunting roughly two million years ago. That's a long time. This was our means of survival and contributed significantly to the development of modern man. Hunting has been a necessity ever since, up until very recently. If you said man has not HAD to hunt for the last 100 years, that would probably be generous, but we'll say 100 years. 100 years in the last 2 million comes out to .005% of our existence that we have had the luxury of stores providing meat so that we were not required to hunt to survive. I cannot wrap my mind around how something that has gone on for 99.995% of our existence on this planet, the key to our survival, and is now considered barbaric by the anti-hunting crowd. Then you look at the methods by which the anti-hunters obtain their meat (i.e. factory farming), and we are the ones that are considered cruel? Being a hunter is continuing the methods to survive that have gone on for millions and millions of years. There is no shame in that. Anyone that opposes hunting as a means of survival is nothing short of ignorant of the big picture. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Huntng - for or against and why?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom