Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
I have to ask!
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="uncle money bags" data-source="post: 2067959" data-attributes="member: 8377"><p>If my response has met your threshold of jackassery, or any body elses for that matter, may i suggest you have set the bar a little low. It seems you are no less taken aback by my answer than i was to your hypothetical. The op asked a pretty specific, no b.s. question and any one who would dared to answer should have considered your possible scenario. It did not occur to me that given the range of experience that we have on this forum some body would publicly stand and be counted without doing so. It would seem i was mistaken.</p><p>I guess my question to you would be: Is your person in the hypothetical somebody who should have a firearm in the first place? Is this an individual who would be barred from firearm ownership on the basis of their mental state or capacity? What would their honest answer to question 11f on the 4473 be? If they are legal, then they are legal and deserve to same protections as you ( presumably ) and I.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="uncle money bags, post: 2067959, member: 8377"] If my response has met your threshold of jackassery, or any body elses for that matter, may i suggest you have set the bar a little low. It seems you are no less taken aback by my answer than i was to your hypothetical. The op asked a pretty specific, no b.s. question and any one who would dared to answer should have considered your possible scenario. It did not occur to me that given the range of experience that we have on this forum some body would publicly stand and be counted without doing so. It would seem i was mistaken. I guess my question to you would be: Is your person in the hypothetical somebody who should have a firearm in the first place? Is this an individual who would be barred from firearm ownership on the basis of their mental state or capacity? What would their honest answer to question 11f on the 4473 be? If they are legal, then they are legal and deserve to same protections as you ( presumably ) and I. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
I have to ask!
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom