Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="criticalbass" data-source="post: 2100889" data-attributes="member: 711">Haven&#039;t read the whole thread, but the old JB would have howled at the dancing monkeys.It is obvious that a bunch of folks are believing this stuff.&nbsp; I think the &quot;X-Files factor&quot; is at work here--&quot;I want to believe . . . &quot;You can believe the antis are stupid if you want to.&nbsp; They aren&#039;t.&nbsp; Misdirected, devious, dedicated, dangerous, but for the most part not stupid, at least at the leadership level.I recently heard a really frightening radio interview with a heavy &quot;anti.&quot;&nbsp; He knew his stuff, and ticked off all the (from his perspective) weaknesses of the old assault weapons ban.&nbsp; He even knew the difference between clips and magazines.&nbsp; These bastards are serious and prepared.Yes, this was a funny satire, but after the laughter remember that we are faced with a serious effort to gut the Second Amendment.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="criticalbass, post: 2100889, member: 711"] Haven't read the whole thread, but the old JB would have howled at the dancing monkeys. It is obvious that a bunch of folks are believing this stuff. I think the "X-Files factor" is at work here--"I want to believe . . . " You can believe the antis are stupid if you want to. They aren't. Misdirected, devious, dedicated, dangerous, but for the most part not stupid, at least at the leadership level. I recently heard a really frightening radio interview with a heavy "anti." He knew his stuff, and ticked off all the (from his perspective) weaknesses of the old assault weapons ban. He even knew the difference between clips and magazines. These bastards are serious and prepared. Yes, this was a funny satire, but after the laughter remember that we are faced with a serious effort to gut the Second Amendment. [/QUOTE]

Verification