Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Impeachment?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SoonerP226" data-source="post: 2318963" data-attributes="member: 26737"><p>It's more like indicted and convicted, but yeah. There were a bunch of Senators who thought that perjury wasn't a serious enough crime to justify the removal of a sitting President, no matter how worthless he was, and they voted that way when it came down to it. </p><p></p><p>Andrew Jackson is a better example of a President who did something worthy of being removed from office (basically, he told the Supreme Court to suck it), and he didn't even get impeached. Grant's administration suffered plenty of corruption, most of the Presidents between him and TR were, at best, useless as teats on a boar, and Harding had a scandal big enough to get its own name (Teapot Dome), and you want to remove a sitting President over doing something every politicrit does?</p><p></p><p>Don't get me wrong--I think Slick Willie was an awful President, and I would've loved to see him tarred and feathered, but convincing someone to remove a sitting President over a lie is a tough row to hoe.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SoonerP226, post: 2318963, member: 26737"] It's more like indicted and convicted, but yeah. There were a bunch of Senators who thought that perjury wasn't a serious enough crime to justify the removal of a sitting President, no matter how worthless he was, and they voted that way when it came down to it. Andrew Jackson is a better example of a President who did something worthy of being removed from office (basically, he told the Supreme Court to suck it), and he didn't even get impeached. Grant's administration suffered plenty of corruption, most of the Presidents between him and TR were, at best, useless as teats on a boar, and Harding had a scandal big enough to get its own name (Teapot Dome), and you want to remove a sitting President over doing something every politicrit does? Don't get me wrong--I think Slick Willie was an awful President, and I would've loved to see him tarred and feathered, but convincing someone to remove a sitting President over a lie is a tough row to hoe. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Impeachment?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom