Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Buzzgun" data-source="post: 1292783" data-attributes="member: 4715">Well, you are the one who suggested I was ignorant on the matter, figured you must be an expert if you know enough to tell me I don&#039;t have a clue?? Now, you say you don&#039;t have an explanation, so, how do you know I&#039;m wrong if you don&#039;t have the answer??It&#039;s your contention that &quot;initial bailout was very much needed to prevent a total collapse&quot; that I call into question. I haven&#039;t seen any proof that there would have been a total collapse without the bailout?? I have heard some say that, but I have heard just the opposite from others.I&#039;m not sure that the nature of economic is as technical as some want us to believe. I believe much of it is like lawyer talk, purposely obtuse to confuse the masses and insure the need for their services! <img src="/images/smilies/rolleyes.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)&nbsp; &nbsp; :rolleyes:" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Buzzgun, post: 1292783, member: 4715"] Well, you are the one who suggested I was ignorant on the matter, figured you must be an expert if you know enough to tell me I don't have a clue?? Now, you say you don't have an explanation, so, how do you know I'm wrong if you don't have the answer?? It's your contention that "initial bailout was very much needed to prevent a total collapse" that I call into question. I haven't seen any proof that there would have been a total collapse without the bailout?? I have heard some say that, but I have heard just the opposite from others. I'm not sure that the nature of economic is as technical as some want us to believe. I believe much of it is like lawyer talk, purposely obtuse to confuse the masses and insure the need for their services! :rolleyes: [/QUOTE]

Verification