Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Insurance policy just for guns from State Farm.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="C_Hallbert" data-source="post: 4221238" data-attributes="member: 42957"><p>My ‘Spidey Sense’ detects that this bill is an essential component of a California Government Plan to collect specific information regarding the personal possession of firearms that they are legally unable to force their law abiding citizens to divulge through the use of a third party with the ability to coerce the information. Specifically, insurance companies can (and certainly will) introduce clauses in home owners policies that will negate coverage for claims when it is determined that the presence of firearms on the premises was not disclosed. The sharing of information between these companies and various levels of governments {<a href="https://archive.globalpolicy.org/sites/default/files/download/2021-1022-UN-Monitor-28-UNGA-Partnerships-and-Private-Sector.pdf" target="_blank">https://archive.globalpolicy.org/sites/default/files/download/2021-1022-UN-Monitor-28-UNGA-Partnerships-and-Private-Sector.pdf</a>}* (*Note- this site and the information contained therein has been removed from access by the general public and is now only available to select audiences—> but I already read it). The U.N. Agenda ultimately provides for a worldwide system for controlling natural resources, energy production and use, production, transportation, communications, agriculture, commerce, locations where where populations reside, insuring compliance with official regulations for healthcare and the control of epidemics (vaccines etc), and any other aspects of life that are scientifically and technologically deemed necessary for the benefit of society as a collective. There is even a plan for emigrating people back into urban centers to re-wild the planet. The implementation of this plan is heavily dependent upon the development of partnerships between governments and the private sector so as to circumvent potential opposition from those they seek to control by eliminating potential opposition presented by the democratic process. So, getting back to the subject—> I view this bill as an example of an effort to implement a partnership between State Government and the Private Sector intended to gather information about private citizens that can and will be used later for a much darker purpose…., this is my opinion and I’m sticking to it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="C_Hallbert, post: 4221238, member: 42957"] My ‘Spidey Sense’ detects that this bill is an essential component of a California Government Plan to collect specific information regarding the personal possession of firearms that they are legally unable to force their law abiding citizens to divulge through the use of a third party with the ability to coerce the information. Specifically, insurance companies can (and certainly will) introduce clauses in home owners policies that will negate coverage for claims when it is determined that the presence of firearms on the premises was not disclosed. The sharing of information between these companies and various levels of governments {[URL]https://archive.globalpolicy.org/sites/default/files/download/2021-1022-UN-Monitor-28-UNGA-Partnerships-and-Private-Sector.pdf[/URL]}* (*Note- this site and the information contained therein has been removed from access by the general public and is now only available to select audiences—> but I already read it). The U.N. Agenda ultimately provides for a worldwide system for controlling natural resources, energy production and use, production, transportation, communications, agriculture, commerce, locations where where populations reside, insuring compliance with official regulations for healthcare and the control of epidemics (vaccines etc), and any other aspects of life that are scientifically and technologically deemed necessary for the benefit of society as a collective. There is even a plan for emigrating people back into urban centers to re-wild the planet. The implementation of this plan is heavily dependent upon the development of partnerships between governments and the private sector so as to circumvent potential opposition from those they seek to control by eliminating potential opposition presented by the democratic process. So, getting back to the subject—> I view this bill as an example of an effort to implement a partnership between State Government and the Private Sector intended to gather information about private citizens that can and will be used later for a much darker purpose…., this is my opinion and I’m sticking to it. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Insurance policy just for guns from State Farm.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom