Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Intruders 0 - Homeowner's Son 3
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mugsy" data-source="post: 2973774" data-attributes="member: 18914"><p>And society agrees, in general, so death is not the punishment for stealing or vandalizing in our legal code. But your comment and point are not relevant to this case, because here the perpetrators' deaths were a predictable and defensible outcome of invading a person's residence (prima facie evidence of ill intent) while armed (presumably to cause great bodily harm), wearing clothes to hide one's identity (another clear sign of ill intent). The young man who defended himself did not administer a legal punishment - he defended himself against aggressive invaders clearly intent on doing ill and prepared to do great harm. He did nothing wrong in defending himself.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mugsy, post: 2973774, member: 18914"] And society agrees, in general, so death is not the punishment for stealing or vandalizing in our legal code. But your comment and point are not relevant to this case, because here the perpetrators' deaths were a predictable and defensible outcome of invading a person's residence (prima facie evidence of ill intent) while armed (presumably to cause great bodily harm), wearing clothes to hide one's identity (another clear sign of ill intent). The young man who defended himself did not administer a legal punishment - he defended himself against aggressive invaders clearly intent on doing ill and prepared to do great harm. He did nothing wrong in defending himself. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Intruders 0 - Homeowner's Son 3
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom