Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Is a NICS check really full-on gun registration already?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="abajaj11" data-source="post: 2080830" data-attributes="member: 3553"><p>NICs checks DO NOT ALLOW the FBI to keep the data in a database. They are expressly forbidden from doing so. </p><p><a href="http://www.acslpa.org/html/nics_fbi_letter.html" target="_blank">http://www.acslpa.org/html/nics_fbi_letter.html</a></p><p>Right now, a person goes into an FFL, gets the NICs check and gets an OK or a DENY. </p><p>If they get a DENY, the FBI is currently, under Holder, maintaining that information indefinitely.The legality of this is dubious but I am not aware of anyone crying foul over it yet. </p><p> If they get an OK, the FBI is not able to maintain that information in a database, <strong>but has to destroy that data within 24 hours</strong>. I am sure Mr. Holder and POTUs would LOVE to keep that info ( a defacto registration) but they are EXPRESSLY forbidden from doing so and can likely go to jail if they do. </p><p></p><p>The one thing the anti-2As would LOVE is a gun registry of who owns what. <strong>For that, they MUST get a Universal Background Check passed.</strong></p><p><u>see the link below to understand how this can happen:</u></p><p><a href="https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?161424-Why-closing-the-quot-Gun-Show-Loop-Hole-quot-leads-to-registration-of-all-weapons&highlight=show+loophole" target="_blank">https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?161424-Why-closing-the-quot-Gun-Show-Loop-Hole-quot-leads-to-registration-of-all-weapons&highlight=show+loophole</a></p><p></p><p> Everything else,...the assault weapon ban, the magazine cap limit, etc is all SMOKE and MIrrors in my opinion.<strong> It's like a conjuring trick...they want you to focus on those while they try to sneak in a Universal Background Check. </strong></p><p>We <strong>must</strong> stop it. I am talking ONLY about the UBC when i talk to my senators and congressman's offices every week. </p><p><img src="/images/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="abajaj11, post: 2080830, member: 3553"] NICs checks DO NOT ALLOW the FBI to keep the data in a database. They are expressly forbidden from doing so. [url]http://www.acslpa.org/html/nics_fbi_letter.html[/url] Right now, a person goes into an FFL, gets the NICs check and gets an OK or a DENY. If they get a DENY, the FBI is currently, under Holder, maintaining that information indefinitely.The legality of this is dubious but I am not aware of anyone crying foul over it yet. If they get an OK, the FBI is not able to maintain that information in a database, [B]but has to destroy that data within 24 hours[/B]. I am sure Mr. Holder and POTUs would LOVE to keep that info ( a defacto registration) but they are EXPRESSLY forbidden from doing so and can likely go to jail if they do. The one thing the anti-2As would LOVE is a gun registry of who owns what. [B]For that, they MUST get a Universal Background Check passed.[/B] [U]see the link below to understand how this can happen:[/U] [url]https://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?161424-Why-closing-the-quot-Gun-Show-Loop-Hole-quot-leads-to-registration-of-all-weapons&highlight=show+loophole[/url] Everything else,...the assault weapon ban, the magazine cap limit, etc is all SMOKE and MIrrors in my opinion.[B] It's like a conjuring trick...they want you to focus on those while they try to sneak in a Universal Background Check. [/B] We [B]must[/B] stop it. I am talking ONLY about the UBC when i talk to my senators and congressman's offices every week. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Is a NICS check really full-on gun registration already?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
