Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Is anybody following the manhunt down in the Davis/Wynnewood area?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JoeUSooner" data-source="post: 4131275" data-attributes="member: 55109"><p>Bob, you misunderstand... under the 1st Amendment, it is perfectly legal to make a general statement such as "He ought to be shot!" But it is not legal to make a statement such as "Let's shoot him," which is active incitement. There's a distinct difference.</p><p>Mulberry volunteered to act as a hangman, which - as long as his offer applies to a properly-convicted criminal - is not at all illegal. In fact, Mulberry's offer is similar to my longstanding position. While I flatly will <em>not</em> intentionally incite anyone to commit violence, if certain violent acts do actually occur... I will be among the first in line to donate to the accused's defense fund (which is a perfectly legal action). </p><p></p><p>By the way, Mulberry... you're correct. Bob has <strong>no</strong> functional, viable, workable, or practical solution to the problem of societal/mob or individual violence - nor does any liberal, for that matter. Asking Bob to provide a solution is a waste of your time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JoeUSooner, post: 4131275, member: 55109"] Bob, you misunderstand... under the 1st Amendment, it is perfectly legal to make a general statement such as "He ought to be shot!" But it is not legal to make a statement such as "Let's shoot him," which is active incitement. There's a distinct difference. Mulberry volunteered to act as a hangman, which - as long as his offer applies to a properly-convicted criminal - is not at all illegal. In fact, Mulberry's offer is similar to my longstanding position. While I flatly will [I]not[/I] intentionally incite anyone to commit violence, if certain violent acts do actually occur... I will be among the first in line to donate to the accused's defense fund (which is a perfectly legal action). By the way, Mulberry... you're correct. Bob has [B]no[/B] functional, viable, workable, or practical solution to the problem of societal/mob or individual violence - nor does any liberal, for that matter. Asking Bob to provide a solution is a waste of your time. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Is anybody following the manhunt down in the Davis/Wynnewood area?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom