Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Is the ATF Planning a Pistol Brace Amnesty Registration?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Perplexed" data-source="post: 3852226" data-attributes="member: 7157"><p>This is why the <em>West Virginia v. EPA</em> decision this summer has such great significance - basically, the Supreme Court ruled that EPA could not rely on chevron deference when it came to promulgating new regulations regarding the coal production industry. Chevron deference being, Congress would defer to the executive agency‘s “best judgment” when it comes to promulgating new regulations. The ATF relies on chevron deference to issue new rules such as the outlawing of bump stocks and arm braces, using nothing more than their own (spurious) judgement, and Congress would defer to the ATF. There are lawsuits now that name the ATF as the defendant because chevron deference was struck down in the EPA case, so it should be the same where the ATF is concerned. I’m hopeful these lawsuits will be decided in favor of the Second.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Perplexed, post: 3852226, member: 7157"] This is why the [I]West Virginia v. EPA[/I] decision this summer has such great significance - basically, the Supreme Court ruled that EPA could not rely on chevron deference when it came to promulgating new regulations regarding the coal production industry. Chevron deference being, Congress would defer to the executive agency‘s “best judgment” when it comes to promulgating new regulations. The ATF relies on chevron deference to issue new rules such as the outlawing of bump stocks and arm braces, using nothing more than their own (spurious) judgement, and Congress would defer to the ATF. There are lawsuits now that name the ATF as the defendant because chevron deference was struck down in the EPA case, so it should be the same where the ATF is concerned. I’m hopeful these lawsuits will be decided in favor of the Second. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Is the ATF Planning a Pistol Brace Amnesty Registration?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
