Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Is this real or not? You decide.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WhiteyMacD" data-source="post: 1322295" data-attributes="member: 7633"><p>Is the rotation enough to cause negative deflection? I still want to know how the angle of deflection would be negative.</p><p></p><p>As for the "Top effect", I can see this if it was a RN, but IIRC all .40s are FN and the reduction from .40 to the FN I see a fairly large axis there that would make it difficult for the axis to remain completely perpendicular to the rotation. I dont know, maybe the RPS is high enough it can maintain.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WhiteyMacD, post: 1322295, member: 7633"] Is the rotation enough to cause negative deflection? I still want to know how the angle of deflection would be negative. As for the "Top effect", I can see this if it was a RN, but IIRC all .40s are FN and the reduction from .40 to the FN I see a fairly large axis there that would make it difficult for the axis to remain completely perpendicular to the rotation. I dont know, maybe the RPS is high enough it can maintain. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Is this real or not? You decide.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
