Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Istanbul Drill
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="D. Hargrove" data-source="post: 2986982" data-attributes="member: 41761"><p>I personally have no issues on termination with extreme prejudice. Goes right along with the old two to the body and one to the head philosophy. Ensuring you are trained in both identification of potential suicide bombers and delivering head shots at distance would seem to be key. Realistically, even in combat there is little to no way to identify a bomber from 50 yards, so even if you have your trusty M4 trained on him or her, determine the potential for collateral damage and engage, there must be an ingrained thought process that delineates between body shots that render the attacker neutralized and reduce the risk of collateral damage or a headshot that may or may not hit the intended target at distance and striking a non-combatant. If identified at say a distance of 10 yards, do you perform the same set of risk assessment procedures, dive to cover for your life or engage the adversary IOT kill? If the wrong decision is made, BOOM and **** will fly everywhere. Good luck with this one.... I just hope and pray it never has to happen in the first place.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="D. Hargrove, post: 2986982, member: 41761"] I personally have no issues on termination with extreme prejudice. Goes right along with the old two to the body and one to the head philosophy. Ensuring you are trained in both identification of potential suicide bombers and delivering head shots at distance would seem to be key. Realistically, even in combat there is little to no way to identify a bomber from 50 yards, so even if you have your trusty M4 trained on him or her, determine the potential for collateral damage and engage, there must be an ingrained thought process that delineates between body shots that render the attacker neutralized and reduce the risk of collateral damage or a headshot that may or may not hit the intended target at distance and striking a non-combatant. If identified at say a distance of 10 yards, do you perform the same set of risk assessment procedures, dive to cover for your life or engage the adversary IOT kill? If the wrong decision is made, BOOM and **** will fly everywhere. Good luck with this one.... I just hope and pray it never has to happen in the first place. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Istanbul Drill
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom