Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
JB, Lurker, Ignernt and all you other Blue dogs....
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jim Corrigan" data-source="post: 1983486" data-attributes="member: 24714"><p><em>'I'm saying both sides want more power over me, but one side benefits more from me being free to buy their junk than the other who wants to me to "need" them and be my benefactor. (God, that was so much easier to type)'</em></p><p>But that one side doesn't/won't need you to buy things from them, they can look at India, China, or Korea. </p><p> </p><p><em>''There is no "fighting back" cuz I don't want to fight anybody. I don't CARE if they're rich or not. It's not MY place to say who has what, nor is it YOURS. If you're so upset about them being the "haves" and you the "have nots", YOU go fight them. Good luck, Che. I'm fine just being the poor sap that I am.''</em> </p><p></p><p>I'm not upset, you said NEVEREEVEREVEREVER, seemed like you were upset. But if your point remains that it won't work to tax the rich because they won't pay, you're admitting the system is flawed. Big time.</p><p></p><p></p><p><em>And the soviets were running out of food BEFORE the cold war or even WWII for that matter. That's why there was one purge and reform after another from 1920 on up until Stalin and WWII. </em></p><p></p><p>So they had limited resources to being with? They didn't just fail because they were Communists?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jim Corrigan, post: 1983486, member: 24714"] [I]'I'm saying both sides want more power over me, but one side benefits more from me being free to buy their junk than the other who wants to me to "need" them and be my benefactor. (God, that was so much easier to type)'[/I] But that one side doesn't/won't need you to buy things from them, they can look at India, China, or Korea. [I]''There is no "fighting back" cuz I don't want to fight anybody. I don't CARE if they're rich or not. It's not MY place to say who has what, nor is it YOURS. If you're so upset about them being the "haves" and you the "have nots", YOU go fight them. Good luck, Che. I'm fine just being the poor sap that I am.''[/I] I'm not upset, you said NEVEREEVEREVEREVER, seemed like you were upset. But if your point remains that it won't work to tax the rich because they won't pay, you're admitting the system is flawed. Big time. [I]And the soviets were running out of food BEFORE the cold war or even WWII for that matter. That's why there was one purge and reform after another from 1920 on up until Stalin and WWII. [/I] So they had limited resources to being with? They didn't just fail because they were Communists? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
JB, Lurker, Ignernt and all you other Blue dogs....
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom