Reply to Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Gabriel42" data-source="post: 2276577" data-attributes="member: 28680">Update: Spoke with Mark Swiney, Senior Assistant City Attorney for the city of Tulsa, who was extremely pleasant and surprisingly informed. He informed me that the City of Tulsa was aware of the fact that the city ordinance conflicted with the state SDA laws and they have begun taking steps to remedy a few things. Specifically:1. Submitted an opinion letter from the City administration to the Parks Department and the Tulsa Police Department, stating that there is a conflict between city and state law, that state law wins out, and that both OC and CC are legal in city parks with possession of SDA license. 2. Started the process of ordering replacement signage that replaces the "strictly prohibited" verbiage with signs that state the carry of weapons is prohibited unless in accordance with state law, or something to that effect. 3. Begun the process required to modify the municipal code. Also, made the statement that we as permit holders are aware of the law and should know that the signs are not meant for us. I explained that while we are aware, most would rather not deal with the hassle to test that theory. BTW, I only OC while at the gun store I work at; the rest of the time I am strictly CC and mostly ignore these kind of signs.</blockquote>